Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Dokumen dengan Pendekatan Kepelbagaian Sumber Terhadap Pengetahuan Sejarah

  • M. Kaviza Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden, Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)
Keywords: pembelajaran berasaskan dokumen, pendekatan kepelbagaian sumber, pengetahuan sejarah

Abstract

Kajian eksperimen kuasi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kesan pembelajaran berasaskan dokumen dengan pendekatan kepelbagaian sumber terhadap pencapaian pengetahuan sejarah. Sampel kajian ini merupakan murid tingkatan satu dari tiga buah sekolah menengah harian yang telah ditentukan berdasarkan teknik persampelan berkelompok. Instrumen kajian ini merupakan ujian pencapaian pengetahuan sejarah yang telah disahkan oleh pakar penilai dan mempunyai nilai ketekalan yang baik. Data kajian ini telah dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif dan inferensi iaitu ujian ANOVA Satu Hala dengan menggunakan perisian IBM SPSS versi 24. Dapatan kajian ini telah melaporkan bahawa pembelajaran berasaskan dokumen dengan pendekatan kepelbagaian sumber adalah lebih berkesan terhadap pencapaian pengetahuan sejarah berbanding dengan pembelajaran berasaskan dokumen tanpa pendekatan kepelbagaian sumber dan pengajaran sedia ada. Implikasi kajian ini telah membuktikan bahawa pembelajaran berasaskan dokumen dengan pendekatan kepelbagaian sumber adalah lebih berpotensi dilaksanakan dalam pendidikan sejarah selaras dengan perkembangan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (TMK).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rahman Haji Abdullah. (2006). Pengantar ilmu sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Andi Suwarirta. (2007). Sejarah dan pendidikan sejarah: Perspektif Malaysia dan Indonesia. Bandung: Historia Utama Press.

Abdul Razaq Ahmad (2010). The acquisition of conceptual understanding of historical thinking in the context of multi-ethnic students in Malaysia. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 10(2), 108-119.

Ahmad Razaq Ahmad & Ahmad Rafaai Ayudin. (2011). History curriculum development model towards nation building of Malaysia. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 12(1), 40-52.

Allen, R.B. (2011, Ogos). Developing a knowledge-based to improve interaction with collections of historical newspapers. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di International Federation of Library Association (IFLA), San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Alves, D. (2014). Introduction: digital methods and tools for historical research. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 8(1), 1-12.

Anuar Ahmad, Siti Haishah Abd. Rahman, & Nur Atiqah T.Abdullah. (2009). Tahap Keupayaan Pengajaran Guru Sejarah dan hubunganya dengan pencapaian murid di sekolah berprestasi rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34(1), 53-66.

Barton, K.C. (2018). Historical sources in the classroom: Purpose and use. HSSE Online, 7(2), 1-11.

Booth, M.B. (1983). Skills, concepts, and attitudes: the development of adolescent children’s historical thinking. History and Theory, 22(4), 101-117.

Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Why we need a new approach of teaching digital literacy. Kappan, 99(6), 27-32.

Britt, M.A., & Rouet, J.F. (2011). Research challenges in the use of multiple documents. International Design Journal, 19(1), 62-68. doi:10.1075/idj.18108br

Brooks, S. (2013). Teaching for historical understanding in the advanced placement program: A case study. The History Teacher, 47(1), 61-76.

Brown, C.A. (2007). Using digital primary sources: A success story in collaboration. Teacher Librarian, 35(2), 29-33

Callahan, C. (2013). Analyzing historical photographs to promote civic competence. Social Studies Research & Practice, 8(1), 77-88.

Chassanoff, A. (2013). Historians and the use of primary source materials in the digital age. The American Archivist, 76(2), 458-479.

Chick, K.A. (2006). Fostering student collaboration through the use of historical picture books. The Social Studies, 152-157.

Colby, S.R. (2008). Energizing the history classroom: Historical narrative inquiry and historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(3), 60-79.

Cook, T, D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Counsell, C. (2000). Historical knowledge and historical skills: A distracting dichotomy issues in History Teaching. United Kingdom: Routledge.

Cowgill II, D.A. (2015). Primary sources in the social studies classroom: Historical inquiry with book backdrops. Social Studies Research and Practice, 10(1), 65-83.

Deborah, J.H. (2012). Engaging students in historical thinking: Implementing the Australian history curriculum. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 10(1), 3-11. doi:10.108/00131857.2015.1101363

Donnelly, D. (2014). Using feature films in teaching historical understanding: research and practice. AGORA, 4-12.

Donnelly, D.J. (2018). Contemporary multimodal historical representations and the teaching of disciplinary understandings in history. Journal of International Social Studies, 8(1), 113-132.

Donnelly, M., & Claire, N. (2011). Doing History. United State America: Routledge

Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Schuster Macmillan.

Ebel, R.L., & Frishie, D.A. (1991). Essential of educational measurement (5th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.

Fehn, B., & Schul, J, F. (2014). Selective appropriation and historical documentary making in special education classroom. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9(2), 1- 14. Fertig, G. (2008). Using biography to help young learners understand the causes of historical change and continuity. The Social Studies, 99(4), 147–154. doi:10.32000/TSSS.99.4

Friedman, A.M. (2006). World history teacher’s use of digital primary sources: The effect of training. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(1), 124-141.

Fry, M.L., & Ensminger, D.C. (2008). Integration of digital primary sources, 441- 448.

Gagnon, G.W., & Collay D.M. (2001). Design for learning: Six elements in constructivist classrooms. California: Corwin Press.

Green, S.B., & Salkind, N.J. (2017). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Griffith, A. (2010). SPSS for dummies (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley Publishing Inc.

Hastings, P., Hughes, S., Magliano, J.P., Goldman, S.R. (2012). Assessing the use of multiple sources in student essays. Beh Res, 44, 622-633. doi:10.2758.s13428-012-0214-0

Haycock, C.A. (1991). Resource-based learning: A shift in the roles of teacher, learner. NASSP Bull, 75(535), 15-22.

Hendrickson, L. (2016). Teaching with artifacts and special collections. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(1), 136-140. Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and Learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Education Technology Research Development, 45(4), 37-64.

Hover, S.V., Hicks, D., & Dack, H. (2016). From source to evidence? Teachers’ use of historical sources in their classrooms. The Social studies, 107(6), 209 -217. doi:10.1080/00377996.2015.1214903

Hynd, C.R. (1999). Teaching students to think critically using multiple texts in history. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(6), 428-436.

Johansson, P. (2017). Learning study as a clinical research practice to generate knowledge about the learning of historical primary source analysis. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 167-181. doi:10.1080/09650792.20161270224

Kaplan, R.M., & Saccuzzo, D.P. (2009). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (7th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Kaviza, M. (2019). Kesan kaedah Document-based lesson terhadap penaakulan sejarah dalam kalangan murid berbeza tahap pemikiran kritis. Juku: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 7(2), 1-9.

Khoo Kay Kim. (1992). Perkembangan pendidikan sejarah: Sejarah dalam pendidikan persatuan sejarah Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Learned, J.E. (2018). Doing history: A study of disciplinary literacy and readers labeled as struggling. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(2), 190-216. doi:10.117711086296x17746446

Lee, J.K. (2002). Digital history in the history/social studies classrooms. The History Teacher, 35(4), 5-8.

Lezah @ Lejah Kiamsin & Rosy Talin. (2018). Kaedah pengajaran sejarah yang diminati pelajar dan justifikasinya. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 137-145.

Levisohn, J.A. (2015). Historical thinking and its alleged unnaturalness. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-13. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1101364

Malar Muthiah. (2015). Kesan Kaedah Stad Terhadap Kekekalan Pengetahuan Sejarah dan Kemahiran Sosial Murid Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Kompilasi Kertas Penyelidikan Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Sultan Abdul Halim Tahun 2012 hingga 2014. Kedah: Institut Pendidikan Guru

Merkt, M., Werner, M., & Wagner, W. (2017). Historical thinking skills and mastery of multiple documents tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 135-146. doi:10.1016/j.indif.2017.01.021

Mink, L. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Mohamad Rodzi Abdul Razak. (2009). Pembinaan negara bangsa Malaysia: Peranan pendidikan sejarah dan dasar pendidikan kebangsaan. JEBAT: Malaysian Journal of History, Polities & Strategy, 36, 90-106.

Mohd Samsudin & Shahizan Shaharuddin. (2012). Pendidikan dan pengajaran mata pelajaran sejarah di sekolah di Malaysia. JEBAT: Malaysian Journal of History, Polities & Strategy, 39(2), 116-141.

Moser, D. (2013). Effects of student engagement with the use of digital primary sources in a high school social studies classroom. Nokes, J.D. (2014). Elementary students’ roles and epistemic stances during document based history lessons. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 375-413. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.937546

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometrie theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Nur Syazwani Abdul Talib, Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani, & Nur Azuki Yusoff. (2016). Tahap pengetahuan dan sikap graduan IPT serta hubungannya dengan minat terhadap sejarah: Usaha awal memupuk semangat cinta negara. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 57-72.

Oppong, C.A. (2012). Exploring pupils’ historical knowledge within junior high school Studies Course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 399-408. doi:10.1016/j.sbspra.2012.09.518

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill Education.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s Theory. In P. Mussen (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp.703-732). New York: Wiley.

Poulton, H. (1972). The historian’s handbook. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Huraian sukatan pelajaran mata pelajaran sejarah tingkatan empat. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2013). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran sejarah tahun empat. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2015). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran mata pelajaran sejarah tingkatan satu. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Putnam, L. (2016). The transnational and the text-searchable: Digitized sources and the shadows the cast. The American Historical Review, 121(2), 377-402. doi: 10.1093/ahr/121.2.377

Reisman, A. (2012). The “document-based lesson”: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233-264. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.591436

Reisman, A. (2017). Integrating content and literacy in social studies: Assessing instructional materials and student work from a common core-aligned intervention. Theory & Research in Social Education, 1-38. Doi: 10.1080/00933104.2017.1292162

Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 5(3), 148-166. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968

Roberts, S.L. (2011). Using counterfactual history to enhance student’s historical understanding. The Social Studies, 102(3), 117-123. doi:10.1080/00377996.2010.525547

Rouet, J.F., Britt, M.A., & Mason, R.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478-493.

Samuelsson, J., & Wendell, J. (2016). Historical thinking about sources in the context of a standards-based curriculum: A Swedish case. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 479-499. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1195275

Sell, C.R., & Griffin, K. (2017). Powerful social studies teaching with poetry and primary sources. The Social Studies, 108(1), 1-9. doi:10.1080/00377996.2016.1237464

Sharifah Aini Jaafar & Arba’iyah Mohd Noor. (2016). Pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran sejarah di sekolah-sekolah di Malaysia, 1957-1989. Sejarah, 25(2), 40-57.

Sheehan, M. (2013). Better to do than receive: Learning to think historically through internally assessed course work. Teaching & Learning Research Initiative, 1-13.

Spiro, R., Coulson, R.L., Feltovisch, P.J., & Anderson, D.C. (1988, Ogos). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science, & Society, Montreal, New Jersey.

Spiro, R.J., & Jehng, J.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stephens, R.P., Lehr, J.L, Thorp, D.B., Ewing, E.T & Hicks, D. (2005). Using technology to teach historical understanding: The digital history reader brings the possibilities of new technology to the history classroom. Social education, 151(4), 1-6.

Suh, Y. (2013). Past looking: Using arts as historical evidence in history teaching. The Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 135-159.

Tan, H.D. (2004). What is history teaching and learning? Teaching and Learning 25(2), 197-206.

Thangamalar Paramasivam & Nagendralingam Ratnavadivel. (2018). Issues and challenges in managing curriculum change in primary schools: A case study of managing year four history curriculum in the district of Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 8(1), 18-31.

Thornton, S.J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.

Tomsic, M., & Deery, C.M. (2019). Creating ‘them’ and ‘us’: The educational framing of picture books to teach about forced displacement and todays ‘refugee crisis’. History of Education Review, 1-16. doi: 10.1108/HER-11-2018-0027

Tyman, T., McCleery, J., & Tindal, G. (2006). Using concepts to frame history content. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(4), 331-349.

VanSledright, B.A., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 98(3), 239-265.

Wagner, D-A. (2018). Teachers’ use of film in the history classroom: A Survey of 19 high school teachers in Norway. Journal of Humanities and Social science Education, 1, 22-44.

Woyshner, C. (2010). Inquiry teaching with primary source documents: An iterative approach. Social Studies Research and Practice, 5(3), 36-45.

Zaccaria, M.A. (1978). The development of historical thinking: Implications for the teaching of history. The History Teacher, 11(3), 323-340.
Published
2021-01-06
How to Cite
Kaviza, M. (2021) “Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Dokumen dengan Pendekatan Kepelbagaian Sumber Terhadap Pengetahuan Sejarah”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(1), pp. 128 - 139. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.642.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>