Penerapan Pemikiran Komputasi dalam Matematik

Kasthuri Devi Angamuthu; Zulkifley Bin Mohamed

doi:10.47405/mjssh.v9i6.2821

Kasthuri Devi Angamuthu Fakulti Sains dan Matematik, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
Zulkifley Bin Mohamed Fakulti Sains dan Matematik, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i6.2821

Keywords: Modul, Taakulan, Perkaitan

Abstract

Kajian ini membangunkan modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dengan penerapan pemikiran komputasi (PPK) bagi tajuk pecahan untuk murid tahun 4 dan tahun 5. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk penyelidikan pembangunan dan kaedah eksperimen digunakan dalam pembangunan dan penilaian modul PPK. Modul PPK yang dibangunkan adalah daripada gabungan teori Piaget (1971), teori pembelajaran Ausubel (1967) Vygotsky (1978) dan Bruner (1966). Kajian menggunakan model Plomp (1997) yang melibatkan tiga fasa utama, iaitu kajian awal, pembangunan dan penilaian. Kaedah persampelan rawak pelbagai peringkat digunakan untuk memilih 80 murid dari Sekolah A dan 100 murid dari Sekolah B yang melibatkan 180 orang murid. Dapatan penyelidikan menunjukkan bahawa modul PPK yang dibina memenuhi syarat kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan berdasarkan penilaian oleh tiga orang pakar dalam bidang Matematik daripada UPSI. Modul PPK berkesan dalam meningkatkan pencapaian murid jika dibandingkan dengan kaedah pembelajaran konvensional. Ini adalah kerana pencapaian murid tahun 4 bagi kumpulan rawatan (Min=24.07, SP=5.658) lebih tinggi daripada kumpulan kawalan (Min=14.87, SP=5.268). Begitu juga untuk murid Tahun 5, pencapaian murid kumpulan rawatan (Min=24.36, SP=4.735) lebih tinggi daripada kumpulan kawalan (Min=15.38, SP=4.682). Maka modul PPK yang dibina berkesan dalam meningkatkan pencapaian murid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A.H., Abidin, N.L.Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133-142.

Amineh, J. R. & Davatgari, H. A. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

Aslina Saad. (2020). Students' computational thinking skill through cooperative learning based on hands-on, inquiry-based and student-centric learning approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 290-296.

Ausubel, D. P. (1967). Learning theory and classroom practice. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Bulletin, 1, 31.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Arts Social Sciences Journal, 7(4), 1-4.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows a step by step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 17.0 update (10th Ed). Boston, MA : Pearson.

González, R., Juan, F. & Eudave, M. D. (2018). Pre-service Teacher's Common Content Knowledge about the Fractions and Decimals. Educación matemática, 30(2), 106-139.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.

Hu, C. (2011). Computational thinking: what it might mean and what we might do about it. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 223-227.New York: ACM.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun Empat. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2017). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Putrajaya: Malaysia.

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M.J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707 – 734.

Lortie-Forgues, H., & Siegler, R. S. (2017). Conceptual knowledge of decimal arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 374–386.

Marcelino, M. J., Pessoa, T., Vieira, C., Salvador, T., & Mendes, A. J. (2018). Learning computational thinking and scratch at distance. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 470-477.

Mohd Amin, M. N., Mohd Faeez, I., Kalthom H., & , Muhammad Syakir Sulaiman, M. A. (2016). Inisiatif dan usaha guru dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan semasa penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 133–144.

Mustapha, S., Rosli, M.S., & Saleh, N.S. (2019). Online learning environment to enhance HOTS in mathematics using Polya's problem solving model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1366(1), number 012081.

Plomp, T. (1997). Educational and Training System Design. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.

Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In D. R. Green, Measurement and Piaget. McGraw-Hill.

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.

Selby, C. C. (2015). Relationships: computational thinking, pedagogy of programming, and bloom’s taxonomy. Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 80–87.

Sung, W., Ahn, J., & Black, J.B. (2017). Introducing computational thinking to young learners: practicing computational perspectives through embodiment in mathematics education. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 22(3), 1-21.

Swasti Maharani, Toto Nusantara, Abdur Rahman As’ari, & Abdul Qohar (2019). Analyticity and systematicity students of mathematics education on solving non-routine problems. Mathematics and Statistics, 7(2), 50 – 55.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The developmental of higher psychological processes Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of science education and technology, 25, 127-147.

Yuliani, T.W., Fuad, Y., & Ekawati, R. (2019). Student's multiple representation in solving addition and subtraction of fraction problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 20, number 012050.

Zakiah Salleh, Norhapidah Mohd Saad, Mohamad Nizam Arshad, Hazaka Yunus & Effandi Zakaria. (2013). Analisis jenis kesilapan dalam operasi penambahan dan penolakan pecahan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 1(1), 1-10.

Zhong, B., Wang, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2016). An exploration of three-dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinking. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 53(4), 562-590.