Penerimaan Penggunaan Mobile Learning di kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 6 dalam Mata Pelajaran Geografi

  • Dympna James Jemson Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
  • Sabariah Sharif Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
  • Soon Singh A/L Bikar Singh Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
Keywords: mobile learning, penerimaan, pelajar tingkatan 6

Abstract

Kajian ini dilaksanakan untuk melihat penerimaan terhadap penggunaan mobile learning di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 6 dalam mata pelajaran geografi. Kaedah kuantitatif digunakan dalam kajian ini yang melibatkan sebuah pusat tingkatan 6 yang terletak di daerah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah seramai 137 orang pelajar. Semua pelajar yang mengambil mata pelajaran geografi telah diambil sebagai sampel kajian. Borang soal selidik digunakan sebagai instrumen dalam kajian ini yang telah diubahsuai dan dirujuk daripada Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk menentukan tahap penerimaan terhadap penggunaan mobile learning di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 6 dalam mata pelajaran Geografi. Hasil daripada analisis statistik menunjukkan bahawa tahap penerimaan pelajar terhadap mobile learning berada di tahap yang tinggi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O. Alharbi, H. Alotebi, A. Masmali, and N. Alreshidi (2017). Instructor Acceptance of Mobile Learning in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study of Hail University. Int. J. Bus. Manag.

C. Gardner and D. L. Amoroso (2004). Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers.

A. İLÇİ (2014). Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers’ Mobile Learning Readiness Levels and Mobile Learning Acceptance Levels.

C. Jarvis, N. Tate, J. Dickie, and G. Brown (2016). Mobile Learning in a Human Geography Field Course. J. Geog..

H. Lateh and V. Muniandy (2010). ICT implementation among Malaysian schools: GIS, obstacles and opportunities. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci, 2(2), 2846–2850.

F. Martin and J. Ertzberger (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Comput. Educ..

F. D. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci., 35, 181–192.

N. Park, R. Roman, S. Lee, and J. E. Chung, (2009). User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 29(3), 196–209.

F. D. Davis (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q., 13(3), 319–340, 1989.

D. M. Putra (2016). The Influence On Factors In Attitudes Toward Acceptance Of The Information System Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Case Study SPAN System In Indonesia. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 5(04).

M. Al-Emran, H. M. Elsherif, and K. Shaalan (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education,” Comput. Human Behav., 56, 93–102.

L. K. Ch’ng and Z. Samsudin (2013). Integration of Mobile Devices into Ubiquitous Learning by the 21st Century Teenagers. Education, 3(6), 362–374.

M. Grimus and M. Ebner (2016). Mobile Phones and Learning Perceptions of Austrian Students, aged 11 to 14 Years. World Conf. Educ. Media Technol., 7, 106–115.

H. Lee, W. Bin Lee, and S. C. Kweon (2013). Conjoint Analysis for Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Education : the Korean Case. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 12(1), 45–51.

R. Darmi and P. Albion (2017). Enhancing oral communication skills using mobile phones among undergraduates english languange learners in Malaysia; Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region, 40.

K. C. Lay (2013). Integration of Mobile Devices into Ubiquitous Learning by the 21st Century Teenagers, Education.

N. S. Alzaza (2013). Opportunities for Utilizing Mobile Learning Services in the Palestinian Higher Education affordances and limitations.pdf,” International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 2(4), 216–222.

K. Welsh and D. France (2012). Smartphones and fieldwork.  Geography, 97, 47–51.

B. Woodcock, A. Middleton, and A. Nortcliffe. (2012). Considering the Smartphone Learner: developing innovation to investigate the opportunities for students and their interest. Student Engagem. Exp. J.

J. Laru (2012). Scaffolding learning activities with collaborative scripts and mobile devices.

M. Grimus and M. Ebner (2016). Mobile Phones and Learning Perceptions of Austrian Students, aged 11 to 14 Years.

W. Brian, D. France, J. R. Park, A. L. Mauchline, V. Powell, and K. Welsh (2015). iPad use in fieldwork : formal and informal use to enhance pedagogical practice in a bring your own technology world,” in First International Conference on the use of iPads in Higher Education 2014, 2015.

P. Veerabhadram, M. De Beer, and P. Conradie (2012). A Mobile Design Framework for Continuous Mobile Learning Environment in Higher Education.  Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 3(10).

J. Pallant (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version12).

K. Karch (2014). An investigation of perceptions about smart mobile phone usage as an instructional tool in a high school classroom. Capella University.

K. Karch and W. Wold (2014). An Investigation Of Perceptions About Smart Mobile Phone Usage As An Instructional Tool In A High School Classroom.

L. C. Larson and T. N. Miller (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future,” Kappa Delta Pi Rec., 47(3), 121–123.

N. F. Sa’don, H. M. Dahlan, A. Ibrahim, and N. Fadzleen (2013). Usage of mobile learning in Malaysian secondary education: Stakeholders’ view.  J. Inf. Syst. Res. Innov., 6, 42–50.

T. Y. Hsu and C. M. Chen. (2010). A mobile learning module for high school fieldwork,” J. Geog.
Published
2019-10-22
How to Cite
Jemson, D. J., Sharif, S. and Bikar Singh, S. S. (2019) “Penerimaan Penggunaan Mobile Learning di kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 6 dalam Mata Pelajaran Geografi”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 4(6), pp. 101 - 107. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v4i6.282.
Section
Articles