Instructional Support, Peer Support, Technical Support, and E-learning Experience: The Mediating Effect of Learning Motivation

  • Nurhamiza Mumin Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 87000 Labuan F.T., Malaysia.
  • Rini Suryati Sulong Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 87000 Labuan F.T., Malaysia.
Keywords: E-learning, Instructional support, Peer support, Technical support, Learning motivation

Abstract

A series of total lockdowns due to the latest pandemic has changed the entire landscape of the education system worldwide. Online learning became the lifeline to ensure the continuity of teaching and learning amid and beyond the pandemic. It plays a vital role in addition to the existing educational setting. This study aims to investigate the relationship between instructional support, peer support, technical support, and e-learning experience. The mediating effect of learning motivation on instructional, peer, and technical support was also examined. The data was collected from 191 respondents using an online survey. A mediation analysis was conducted to examine the mediating effects of learning motivation on instructional support, peer support, technical support, and e-learning. It was found that peer support has a stronger relationship with e-learning experience, followed by instructional support and technical support. The results also found learning motivation as an important element for a meaningful e-learning experience among students. Therefore, instructors, education institutions, and students should work together for a more engaging and meaningful e-learning experience. The incorporation of necessary technologies, course design, strategies, appropriate attitude, and learning motivation are crucial for the success of e-learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor's and Master's thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.006

Alt, D. (2015). Using structural equation modeling and multidimensional scaling to assess students’ perceptions of the learning environment and justice experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 69, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.10.001

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950

Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher reduction method course through technology: Effects of preservice teachers' technology competency. Computer & Education, 45(4), 383-398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.002

Azila-Gbettor, E. M., Abiemo, M.K., & Glate, S.N. (2023). University support and online learning engagement during the Covid-19 period: The role of student vitality. Heliyon, 9, e12832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12832

Brand-Gruwel, S., & Gerjets, P. (2008). Instructional support for enhancing students' information problem solving ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01

Chang, H. Y., Wang, C. Y., Lee, M. H., Wu, H. K., Liang, J. C., Lee, S. W. Y., et al. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants' perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042

Chen, K.C., & Jang, S.J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011

Cheng, Y. (2011). Antecedentsandconsequencesofe-learningacceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x

Chu, R. ,J. & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, Internet self-efficacy and e learning outcomes-The contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011

Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., Diep, A. N., De Greef, M., & Vanwing, T. (2019). Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults' social inclusion and social capital. Computers & Education, 142, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103610

Crocker, S. G., & Mazer, J. P. (2019). Associations among community college students’ technology apprehension and achievement emotions in developmental education courses. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1562624

Day, E. A., Boatman, P. R., Kowollik, V., Espejo, J., McEntire, L. E., & Sherwin, R. E. (2007). Collaborative training with a more experienced partner: Remediating low pretraining self-efficacy in complex skill acquisition. Human Factors, 49(6), 1132-1148. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X249983

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. Lange, Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416-436). Sage Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n21

Eryilmaz, E., Ryan, T., van der Pol, J., Kasemvilas, S., & Mary, J. (2013). Fostering quality and flow of online learning conversations by artifact-centered discourse system. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1), 22-48.

Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2018). Staying motivated to e-learn: Person- and variable-centred perspectives on the longitudinal risks and support. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.006

Gao, H., Ou, Y., Zhang, Z., Ni, M., Zhou, X. & Liao, L. (2021). The relationship between family support and e-learning engagement in college students: the mediating role of e-learning normative consciousness and behaviors and self-efficacy. Front. Psych, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573779

Ginns, P. & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x

Han, J. & Geng, X. (2023). University students’ approaches to online learning technologies: The roles of perceived support, affect/emotion and self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning. Computers & Education, 194, 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104695

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark 2006. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018). Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12520

Ibrahim, N. K., Al Raddadi, R., AlDarmasi, M., Al Ghamdi, A., Gaddoury, M., AlBar,H. M., & Ramadan, I. K. (2021). Medical students’ acceptance and pereptions of e-learning during the Covid-19 closure time in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.11.00

Ifinedo, P., Pyke, J., & Anwar, A. (2018). Business undergraduates’ perceived use outcomes of Moodle in a blended learning environment: The roles of usability factors and external support. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.001

Johnson, C. S. (2017). Collaborative technologies, higher order thinking and self-sufficient learning : A case study of adult learners. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1981

Joksimović, S., Dowell, N., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., et al. (2018). Exploring development of social capital in a CMOOC through language and discourse. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.004

Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students' self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003

Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner – instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005

Kibaru, F. (2018). Supporting faculty to face challenges in the design and delivery of quality courses in virtual learning environments. Turk. Online J. Dist. Educ., 19(4), 176-197.

Kim, R., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computer & Education, 70, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006

Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Comput. Educ., 59, 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006

Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S. & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55, 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007

Law, K. M. Y., Sandnes, F. E., Jian, H., & Huang, Y. (2009). A comparative study of learning motivation among engineering students in South East Asia and beyond. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 144-151.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001

Luo, N., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2019). Retaining learners by establishing harmonious relationships in e-learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(1), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1506811

Lynch, D. J. (2006). Motivational factors, learning strategies, and resources management as predictors of course grades. College Student Journal, 40(2), 423-428.

Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001

McGill, T. & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact. Comput. Educ., 52(2), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R.F., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teach Coll Rec, 115(3), 1-47. http://www.tcrecord.org/library/content.asp?contentid=16882

Mebane, M., Porcelli, R., Iannone, A., Attanasio, C., & Francescato, D. (2008). Evaluation of the efficacy of affective education online training in promoting academic and professional learning and social capital. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(1), 68-86. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10447310701771498

Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-S´anchez, R., & Vallespín-Ar´an, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computer & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012

Mumin, N. (2022). The Impact of Total Lockdown on Malaysians: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12), 281-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i12/15408

Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005

Pedro, N. & Kumar, S. (2020). Institutional support for online teaching in quality assurance frameworks. Online Learn., 24(3), 50-66.

Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374

Porcaro, D. (2011). Applying constructivism in instructivist learning cultures. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504971111121919

Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments., 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886

Ramírez-Correa, P.E., Arenas-Gaitan, J., & Rondan-Cataluna,F.J. (2015). Gender and Gender and acceptance of e-learning: A multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain. PloS One, 10(10), e0140460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140460

Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192

Ruzek, E., Aldrup, K. & Ludtke, O. (2022). Assessing the effects of student perceptions of instructional quality: A cross-subject within-student design. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70, 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102085

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Schenke, K., Lam, A. C., Conley, A. M., & Karabenick, S. A. (2015). Adolescents’ help seeking in mathematics classrooms: Relations between achievement and perceived classroom environmental influences over one school year. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.003

Scherer, R., Nilsen, T., & Jansen, M. (2016). Evaluating individual students’ perceptions of instructional quality: An investigation of their factor structure, measurement invariance, and relations to educational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110

Schmid, R.F., Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R.M., Pickup, D.I., & Abrami, P.C. . (2023). A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers. . Computers and Education Open, 5, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142

Sharif-Nia, H., Allen, K., Arslan, G., Reardon, J., She, Long, Ghahrani, N., Rahmatpour, P., & Fomani, F. K. (2023). E-learning Acceptance: The Mediating Role of Student Computer Competency in the Relationship Between the Instructor and the Educational Content. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, e1-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.08.001

Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003

Soper, D.S. (2023). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc

Stephan, M., Markus, S., & Gl¨aser-Zikuda, M. (2019). Students’ achievement emotions and online learning in teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00109

Sulong, R. S. & Mumin, N. (2023). Students' learning experience and preference: A case of Malaysian University Students. Proceedings of Seminar on Innovative Learning & Teaching (SILT) 2023 (pp. 29-37). Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.: Centre for Academic Excellence and Development (CAED).

Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Taylor, P. & Maor, D. (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the constructivist online learning environement survey. 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum . Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Tsai, C.-L., Ku, H.-Y., & Campbell, A. (2021). Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Education, 42(1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869525

Wagner, W., G¨ollner, R., Werth, S., Voss, T., Schmitz, B., & Trautwein, U. (2016). Student and teacher ratings of instructional quality: Consistency of ratings over time, agreement, and predictive power. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 705-721. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000075

Wang, R., Han, J., Liu, C., & Xu, H. (2021). How do university students’ perceptions of the instructor’s role influence their learning outcomes and satisfaction in cloud based virtual classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 627443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627443

Wei, X., Saab, N. & Admiraal, W. (2023). Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880

Wilson, D. M., Summers, L. & Wright, J. (2020). Faculty support and student engagement in undergraduate engineering. J. Res. Inn. Tea. Lea., 13(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-02-2020-0011

Wouters, P., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 412-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.018

Yin, Y. T., Law, M. Y. K., & Chuah, K. B. (2007). Investigation of the motivating factors influencing team learning. the 5th International Symposium on Management of Technology. CD Rom.

Zalat, M.M., Hamed, M.S., & Bolbol, S.A. (2021). The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PloS One, 16(3), e0248758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248758

Zalazar-Jaime, M. F., Moretti, L. S., García-Batista, Z. E., & Medrano, L. A. (2021). Evaluation of an academic satisfaction model in E-learning education contexts. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1979047

Zhang, Z., Cao, T., Shu, J., & Liu, H. (2020). Identifying key factors affecting college students’ adoption of the e-learning system in mandatory blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1723113

Published
2023-12-27
How to Cite
Mumin, N. and Sulong, R. S. (2023) “Instructional Support, Peer Support, Technical Support, and E-learning Experience: The Mediating Effect of Learning Motivation”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(12), p. e002619. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v8i12.2619.
Section
Articles