Strategi Pemahaman Bacaan dalam Teks Bahasa Melayu Sebagai Bahasa Kedua dalam kalangan Murid Suku Kaum Rungus di Sabah
Abstract
Kajian ini dijalankan terhadap murid suku kaum Rungus di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Sikuati II, Kudat, Sabah. Tinjauan lapangan telah melibatkan enam puluh tiga orang murid dalam tingkatan empat. Mereka terdiri daripada dua kumpulan berdasarkan keputusan Pentaksiran Tingkatan Tiga. Kumpulan Pencapaian Rendah (KPR) terdiri daripada tiga puluh tujuh orang peserta sementara Kumpulan Pencapaian Tinggi (KPT) seramai dua puluh enam orang peserta. Penulis meneroka kekerapan penggunaan strategi kognitif dan meta kognitif peserta KPR dan KPT dalam pemahaman bacaan teks bahasa Melayu. Penulis memanipulasikan empat belas item soal selidik adaptasi daripada kajian Osuji (2017) dan menggunakan pemeringkatan min untuk semua item strategi. Bagi menentukan kekerapan penggunaan strategi kognitif dan meta kognitif oleh peserta kajian semasa menyempurnakan tugas pemahaman bacaan, penulis menetapkan titik interval 0.80 pada skala Likert 5 mata. Hasil kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa kedua-dua peserta kumpulan lebih kerap menggunakan strategi meta kognitif daripada strategi kognitif dalam pemahaman bacaan teks bahasa Melayu. Walau bagaimanapun, nilai min kekerapan penggunaan kedua-dua strategi dalam data KPT adalah lebih tinggi daripada KPR. Hasil kajian ini mempunyai implikasi positif terhadap pengajaran membaca dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu, khususnya dalam kalangan murid-murid peribumi Sabah yang bukan penutur jati bahasa Melayu.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, R. M. (2020). Investigating EFL Learners' Awareness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Students in Different Disciplines. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 294-304.
Ashton-Hay, S., & Brookes, D. (2011). Here’s a story: Using student podcasts to raise awareness of language learning strategies. EA Journal, 26(2), 15-27.
Bimmel, P. E., van den Bergh, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2001). Effects of strategy training on reading comprehension in first and foreign language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(4), 509-529.
Carifio, L., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50 year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150-1152.
Commander, N. E., Ashong, C., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategiesby Undergraduate US and Chinese Students. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 42, 40.
Elekaei, A., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2020). A Study into the Impact of the Choice of Cognitive and Meta-Cognitive Strategies and Podcasts on Vocabulary Gain and Retention Levels in the" Telegram"-Based E-Learning Context. Teaching English with Technology, 20(2), 98-117.
Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 135-149.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Cross-linguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-44.
Kutluturk, S., & Yumru, H. (2017). Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Training to Enhance Freshmen’s Reading Skills. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 7-15.
Latifa, I. S. (2016, November). A Description of The Uses of Metacognitive Self Regulation and Cognitive Strategy Used with Reading Comprehension. In Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9). Atlantis Press.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the Theoretical Framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 320-337. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x.
Maftoon, P. & Tasnimi, M. (2014). Using self-regulated to enhance EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 844-855.
McNeil, L. (2011). Investigating the contributions of background knowledge and reading comprehension strategies to L2 reading comprehension: An explanatory study. Read Writ, 24 (8), 883-902.
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advanced Health Science Education Theory Practice, 15(5), 626-632.
Osuji, C. J. (2017). Cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in first and second language reading comprehension. PhD Thesis. University of Essex, United Kingdom.
Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
Phakiti, A. (2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 1, 53-95.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431- 449.
Tabatabaei, S. S., Ahadi, H., Bahrami, H., & Khamesan, A. (2017). The effects of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) on students’ cognitive and meta-cognitive skills. NeuroQuantology, 15(2): 239-245.
Williams, M., Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2015). Oxford handbooks for language teachers: Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Yau, J.-l. C. (2009). Reading characteristics of Chinese-English adolescents: Knowledge and application of strategic reading. Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 217-235.
Zarei, A. A., & Elekaei, A. (2012). Learner Autonomy and Language Learning Strategies: An Empirical Analysis. Riga, Latvia: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students' metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.