Kesan Komitmen Organisasi Pendidikan Sebagai Moderator ke atas Hubungan Kepimpinan Teknologi Pengetua dalam Pengurusan Kurikulum dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru

  • Roslee Bin Talip Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
  • Tisebio Anak Tiop Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
Keywords: kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum, efikasi kendiri guru, komitmen organisasi pendidikan

Abstract

Kajian ini yang dijalankan adalah mengenai kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum, efikasi kendiri guru dan komitmen organisasi pendidikan. Secara khususnya, kajian ini juga mengenal pasti hubungan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum dengan efikasi kendiri guru. Seterusnya, kajian ini juga mengenal pasti kesan komitmen organisasi pendidikan sebagai moderator dalam hubungan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum dengan efikasi kendiri guru. Kajian ini adalah kajian berbentuk kuantitatif dengan menggunakan soal selidik sebagai instrumen dan dianalisis menggunakan perisian SPSS 25.0. Data dikumpul menggunakan satu set borang soal selidik adaptasi yang ditadbir ke atas 306 orang guru. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum, efikasi kendiri guru dan komitmen organisasi pendidikan diamalkan pada tahap yang tinggi. Ujian korelasi Pearson pula menunjukkan terdapat hubungan linear positif yang sederhana bagi kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum dengan efikasi kendiri guru. Manakala, dengan menggunakan regresi hierarki didapati bahawa pentadbir perlu meningkatkan komitmen organisasi kerana ianya memberi kesan moderator yang positif terhadap hubungan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengurusan kurikulum dan efikasi kendiri guru. Implikasi dan cadangan kajian lanjut turut dibincangkan.

Statistics
Abstract views: 959 , PDF downloads: 859

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, N., Khalid, H., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2015). Amalan kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengintegrasian ICT di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan di Malaysia. Proceeding of the 3rd Global Summit on Education GSE 2015. Kuala      Lumpur.

Abdulkareem, R., Chauhan, A., & Maitama, K. (2015). The relationship between human resource management practices and employee’s turnover intention among registered nurses in Nigerian public hospitals: The mediating role of organisational trust. UTM Press, 2, 95–98.

Ahmad, J., Ather, M. R., & Hussain, M. (2014). Impact of Big Five personality traits on job performance (Organizational commitment as a mediator). Paper presented at the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014, June 25-27, Portorož, Slovenia.

Akcil, U., Aksal, F. A., Mukhametzyanova, F. S., & Gazi, Z. A. (2017). An examination of open and technology leadership in managerial practices of education system. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 119–131.

Ali, S., Farid, F., & Ibrarullah. (2016). Effect of Transformational Leadership on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Humanistic Management Network, Research Paper Series No. 02/16.

Alkrdem, M. (2014). Technological leadership behaviour of high school head teachers in Asia Region, Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 10(2), 95-100.

Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141–150.      

A. Maulod, S., Yan Piaw, C., Ahmad, H., Mei Wei, L., & Alias, S. (2017). Kecerdasan Emosi Pengetua    Dan Hubungannnya Dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Menengah. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 3(3), 54-75.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to research in education (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 

Awanis Binti Mohd., Ainunmadiah Binti Mohd Nawawi., & Siti Noor Binti Ismail. (2017). "Tahap Efikasi Guru Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Sekolah Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Dalam Daerah Bachok." Proceedings of the ICECRS 1, no. 1.

Azizuddin, K., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of Self-Esteem and General Self-Efficacy in Teachers‟ Efficacy in Primary Schools. Psychology, 6,117-125.

Azizul Bin Asi & Mohamed Yusoff Mohd Nor. (2018). Amalan Kepimpinan Distributif Guru Besar Dan Hubungannya Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Guru. Seminar Pendidikan Transdisiplin (Sted 2018).

Babbie, E. R. (2001). The Practice of Social Research (9th ed). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Thompson Learning.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Banoglu, K., Vanderlinde, R., & Cetin, M. (2016). Investigation of principals’ technology leadership profiles in the context of schools’ Learning organization culture and ICT infrastructure: F@tih project schools vs the others. Education and Science, 41(188), 83–98.

Blum M. L., Naylor J. C. (1968). Industrial psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

Butali, P. & Njoroge, D. (2017). Training and Development and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 5(11), 7381-7390.

Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550–567.

Carlos, M. P., & Filipe, C. (2011). From personal values to creativity: Evidence from frontline service employees. European Journal of Marketing, 45 (7/8), 1029-1050.

Chee K. S. (2012). The Influence of Principal’s Technology Leadership on Teacher’ Self-Efficacy and ICT Use In Teaching. (Doctoral Thesis). Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 1: Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.

Cocca, M., Cocca, A., Martinez, E. A., & Bulnes, M. G. R. (2018). Correlation between self-efficacy perception and teaching performance: the case of Mexican Preschool and Primary School teachers. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 56–70.

Cohen L., Manion L., & Morrison K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. (6th Ed.) USA: Routledge.

Connor-Smith, J. K., & Compas, B. E. (2002). Vulnerability to social stress: Coping as a mediator or moderator of sociotropy and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 39–55.

Dardas, L. A., & Ahmad, M. M. (2015). Coping strategies as mediators and moderators between stress and quality of life among parents of children with autistic disorder. Stress and Health, 31(1), 5-12.

Esplin, N. L., Stewart, C., & Thurston, T. N. (2018). Technology leadership perceptions of Utah elementary school principals. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–14.

Faridah Juraime, & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2017). Kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dan hubungannya dengan prestasi akademik sekolah di Malaysia. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(5), 215–230. Retrieved from http://www.ijepc.com/PDF/IJEPC-2017-05-09-17.pdf

Fisher, D. M., & Waller, L. R. (2013). The 21st century principal: A study of technology leadership and technology integration in Texas K-12 schools. The Global E Learning Journal, 2(4), 1-44.

Fuziah, M. Y. & Mohd Izham, M. H. (2011). A study of relationship between leadership practices and learning organization practices in cluster secondary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Latihan MARA, 3(1), 41-56.

Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 569–582.

Gokyer, N. (2018). Organizational Commitment of High School Teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3a.

Hakimi Ismail. (2015). Cabaran Baharu Kerjaya Guru Abad Ke 21. Utusan Online. 15 Mei 2015.

Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT selfefficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(June), 1–8.

Hong, K. & Koh, C. (2002). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards computer among rural secondary school teachers: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35 (1), 27-46.

Horton, T. (2013). The relationship between teachers’ sense of efficacy and perceptions of principal instructional leadership behaviors in high poverty schools. (Unpublished Doctoral Tesis). University of Texas at Arlington.

Hoxha, L. & Hyseni Duraku, Z. (2017). The Relationship between Educational Leadership and Teachers’ Self-efficacy. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences EJSBS Volume XX (eISSN: 2301-2218).

Ibukun, W. O., Oyewole, B. K., & Abe, T. O. (2011). Personality characteristics and principal leadership effectiveness in Ekiti state of Nigeria. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(2), 247–62.    

International Society for Technology in Education. (2009). National Education Technology Standards forAdministrators. Dipetik dari http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-astandards.pdf. Pada 13 Mei 2019.

Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri Sabah. (2019). Data Bilangan Guru Mengikut Sekolah Dan PPD di Negeri Sabah. Kota Kinabalu: Sektor Pengurusan Maklumat dan ICT.

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and Technology Acceptance Model. Educational Technology and Society, 21(3), 48–59.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2013). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. KPM: Putrajaya.

Khair Mohamad Yusof. (2015). “Guru: Membina Ilmu Menyempurnakan Akhlak”. Teks Ucapan Perutusan Hati Guru 2015, Ketua Pengarah Pelajaran sempena  Perayaan Hari Guru ke-44.-15 Mei 2015.

Khairiah, H. (2013). Kepemimpinan instruksional pengetua, birokrasi sekolah dan efikasi  kendiri guru di sebuah MRSM di Melaka. (Dissertasi Sarjana  Kepengetuaan) Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Korman A. K. (1974). Contingency approaches to leadership: An overview. In Hunt J. G. Larson L. L. (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 189-195). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Krejcie, R. V and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30: 607-610.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational School Leadership for Large-Scale Reform: Effects on Students, Teachers, and Their Classroom Practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.

Leong, M. W. (2017). Principal Technology Leadership Practices, Teacher Ict Competency, And Teacher Acceptance Of School Management System (SMS) In Negeri Sembilan Secondary Schools. (Doctoral Thesis), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Levin, R. I., & Rubin, D. S. (1998). Statistics for Management in Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.

Littleton, H., Horsley, S., John, S., & Nelson, D. (2007). Trauma coping strategies and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(6), 977–988.

Madiha, S. (2012). the impact of teachers’ collegiality on their organizational commitment in high-and low-achieving secondary schools in Islamabad, Pakistan. Journal of Studies in Education. 2(2), 130-156.       

Mansor, R., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2015). Kepimpinan Berkualiti: Perspektif mengenai kompetensi yang            diperlukan untuk Memimpin dengan Berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan, 45, 143-154.

Mareena, M., Norhasni, Z. A., Ismi, A. I., & Azizan, A. (2011). Tinjauan hubungan gaya kepimpinan dengan komitmen organisasi. Eksplanasi, 6(1), 17-28. Retrieved from http://merr.utm.my/id/eprint/4862

Mathew, G. A. & Zacharias, S. D. (2016). A Conceptual Overview on Relationship between Employee Attitude towards Training and Organizational Commitment. In Proceedings of International HR Conference (Vol. 3, No. 1).

Metcalf, W. B. (2012). K-12 principals’ perceptions of their technology leadership         preparedness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Georgia Southern University. Dipetik dari https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1400&context=etd. Pada 4 April 2019.

Mei Kin, T., Abdull Kareem, O., Nordin, M. S., & Wai Bing, K. (2018). Principal change leadership competencies and teacher attitudes toward change: the mediating effects of teacher change beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 427-446.

Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah, Faridah Juraime, Aida Hanim A. Hamid, Norazah Nordin & Noraini Attan. (2014). Technology leadership and its relationship with School-Malaysia Standard of Education Quality (School-MSEQ). International Education Studies, 7(13), 278-285.

Mohd Khairuddin, A., Maspiah, S., & Halimah, L. (2017). Kecerdasan Emosi dan Komitmen Guru Terhadap Organisasi. Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesihatan Sosial (JPsiKS), 1, 44–54.

Mohd Majid, K. (2000). “Kaedah Penyelidikan    Pendidikan”. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Mohammed Sani, I., Ghavifekr, S., Ling, S.M.L., Siraj, S. & Azeez, M. I. K. (2014). Can transformational leadership influence on teachers' commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 177-190.  

Mohd Yusof Abdullah. (2006). Pengaruh Motif, Sikap dan Latihan Perguruan Terhadap Profesionalisme Keguruan di Kalangan Pelajar Program Pendidikan IPTA. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Moktar Johar. (2011). Kepimpinan teknologi dan kompetensi ICT guru di SM Agama di Daerah Kuching Sarawak. Tesis Sarjana Kepengetuaan. Institut Kepengetuaan, Universiti Malaya.

Najeemah, M. Y. (2012). School climate and teachers’ commitment: A case study of Malaysia. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 65–75. Dipetik dari https://ssrn.com/abstract=2151470. Pada 5 Julai 2019.

Norhayati, M. D., & Aida Hanim, A. H. (2018).   Kepimpinan Teknologi Pengetua dan Hubungan Terhadap Kompetensi ICT Guru Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban dan Kuala Pilah. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam 2018. Dipetik dari http://www.unisza.edu.my/medc2018. Pada 12 Mac 2019.

Noor Zailani, K., & Azlin Norhaini, M. (2017).   Kompetensi Guru Besar Dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Rendah Di Daerah Padang Terap    Kedah. Prosiding Pendidikan Serantau ke-VIII (2017). Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.

Nurharani, S., Norshidah, N., & Afni Anida, A. (2013). Rekindle teacher's organizational commitment: The effect of transformational leadership behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 566-574.          

Nurulakhma, Y., Harun, B., & Hamzah, M. I, M. (2017). Efikasi Kendiri Guru Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Arab. Malaysian Online Journal of Education. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Ozkan, T., Tokel, A., Celik, M., & Oznacar, B. (2017). Evaluation of technology leadership in the context of vocational school administrators. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (Vol. 1, pp. 727–731). SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications.

Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM: 2013- 2025). (2012). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Dipetik dari http://www.moe.gov.my/v/pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-malaysia-2013-2025. Pada 26 Mei 2019.

Rabindarang, S., Khuan, W. B., & Khoo, Y. Y. (2014). Educators’ reflection on organizational commitment in technical and vocational education. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(2).          

Rabindarang, S., Khuan, W.B., & Khoo, Y. Y. (2018). Amalan Kepimpinan Distributif terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Dalam Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET) 4(2) November: 1-9 (2018).

Razak, N. A., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Keeves, J. P. (2010). The influence of culture on teacher commitment. Social Psychology of Education, 13(2), 185–205.

Sabwami, P. B. (2015). Organizational Commitment As a Moderator of the Relationship Between High Performance Work practices and Organizational Performance. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 2(7), 108-133.

Saimah binti Kiwal. (2013). Hubungan di antara komitmen dan tahap kepuasan kerja guru dalam meningkatkan prestasi pencapaian akademik murid sekolah rendah kebangsaan Kawasan pedalaman Daerah Kota Marudu. Tesis. Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Sathiamoorthy, K. (2013). Kepimpinan teknologi pengetua. Kolokium ICT dalam pengurusan dan kepimpinan pendidikan 2013. Institut Aminuddin Baki.

Shafinaz A Maulod, Chua, Y. P., Hussein, A, Leong, M. W., & Shahrin, A. (2016). Kecerdasan emosi pengetua dan hubungannya dengan efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 3(3), 54–75.

Shafinaz, A. Maulod. (2017). Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan di Negeri Sembilan/Shafinaz A. Maulod (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).

Sun, A., & Xia, J. (2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–97.

Tan, T. H. & Lim, Y. K. (2012). Organizational commitment as a moderator of the effect of training on service performance: An empirical study of small to medium-sized enterprises in Malaysia. International Journal of Management, 29(1), 65-76.

Terborg J. R. (1980). Why must we spell interaction with an “X”: Some alternative views of person X situation interactions. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwest Academy of Management San Antonio.

Thannimalai, Raamani and Raman, Arumugam (2018). The Influence of Principals’ Technology Leadership and Professional Development on Teachers’ Technology Integration in Secondary Schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 15(1), 201-226.

Toprak, M. & Summak, M. S. (2014). Involvement in Change and Commitment to Change: A Study at Public Schools. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 4(4), 953-968.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., and Hoy, W. k. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68: 202-248.

Tschannen-Moran, M and Hoy, A. W (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17: 783-805.

Ugur, N. G., & Koc, T. (2019). Leading and teaching with technology: School principals’ perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(1), 42.

Utusan Borneo Sabah. (2017). Kualiti Pengajaran Guru: Isu dan Cabaran Semasa. Dipetik dari https;//www.pressreader.com/Malaysia/utusan-borneo-sabah/20170419/282643212426811. Pada 16 Oktober 2019.

Wong, A. Y., & Khadijah Daud. (2017). Technology leadership in Malaysia’s High Performance School. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 4(1), 8–14.

Yukl G. A. (2010). Leadership in Organization (7th Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Zedeck S. (1971). Problems with the use of “moderator” variables. Psychological Billetin, 76, 295-310.

Zuraidah M. & Nor, M. Y. M. (2018). Modal Psikologi Dan Komitmen Guru Dalam Organisasi Pendidikan. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN2018). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.
Published
2020-03-28
How to Cite
Talip, R. and Tiop, T. (2020) “Kesan Komitmen Organisasi Pendidikan Sebagai Moderator ke atas Hubungan Kepimpinan Teknologi Pengetua dalam Pengurusan Kurikulum dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(3), pp. 30 - 46. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i3.373.
Section
Articles