The Analysis of Schematic Structure in Students’ Argumentative Essays

Wenjuan Zhang; Kuldip Kaur Maktiar Singh; Mohammad Nor Afandi Ibrahim

doi:10.47405/mjssh.v9i7.2869

Wenjuan Zhang Akademi Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Kuldip Kaur Maktiar Singh Akademi Pengajian Bahasa (APB), UiTM Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor Gajah, KM 26 Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia.
Mohammad Nor Afandi Ibrahim Akademi Pengajian Bahasa (APB), UiTM Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor Gajah, KM 26 Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i7.2869

Keywords: Schematic structure, Argumentative essays, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Higher vocational college students

Abstract

Argumentative essay is an important component in English writing for students in China. The present study investigated the schematic structure of a higher vocational college students’ argumentative writings and its pedagogical implementation in teaching and learning English writing in China context. This study utilized a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze fifteen English argumentative essays of students from a higher vocational college in Anhui, China. The schematic structure was analyzed based on Lee’s (2006) model under Systemic Functional Linguistics. The findings showed that when writing argumentative essays, higher vocational college students in China centered on giving ‘Thesis’, ‘Arguments’ and ‘Reinforcement’ stages. Some essays including high-graded essays did not present the ‘Identification’ stage and many essays ignored the ‘Recommendation’ stage. For the ‘Arguments’ stage, middle-graded and low-graded essays did not exhibit the ‘Point’ and ‘Elaboration’ steps clearly. As many students failed to write reasonable and persuasive argumentative essays, the pedagogical implication is that teachers should help students be conscious of the schematic structure of different writing genres, and give students more opportunities to practice writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Butt, D. G., Fahey, R., Feez, S., & Spinks, S. (2012). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Cao, Y. L. (2018). An analysis of the organizational structure of argumentative essays among Chinese college English learners. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 37(8), 37-42+56.

Coffin, C. (1996). Exploring Literacy in School History. Erskineville, NSW, Australia: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Dept. of School Education.

Ding, Y., & Qin, X. F. (2023). A comparative study of genre structure and sentence structure in Chinese and American PhD dissertations’ acknowledgements. Journal of Elegance and Classic, 8, 56-58.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold.

Hirvela, A. (2017). ‘Argumentation and second language writing: Are we missing the boat?’ Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002

Hyland, K. (1990). A Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105.

Imtiaz, Z., & Mahmood, M. A. (2014). Genre Analysis of Argumentative Essays of Pakistani EFL Learners. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(30), 95-100.

Kamimura, T., & Oi, K. (1996,March). A Crosscultural Analysis of Argumentative Strategies in Student Essays [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Chicago, IL, United States.

Kanestion, A. a/p., & Singh, M. K. a/p S. (2019). A Corpus-based Genre Analysis: Moves in Introductory Paragraph of Argumentative Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 821-831.

Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16(1-2),1-20. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x

Lee, S. H. (2006). The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. [Doctoral thesis, University of Sydney.]

Lei, H. T., & Yang, X. H. (2019). A Comparative Study of Genre Characteristics of Chinese and Foreign English Masters’ Theses of Linguistics. Foreign Language Education, 25-34.

Lei, Y. J. (2017). The Countermeasures of Higher Vocational College Students’ English Argumentative Essays. Science and Technology Vision, 21, 159-160.

Li, Q. (2014). The Move-step Structure Analysis to English Argumentative Essay for English Major Students. Journal of Bijie University, 32(7), 106-111.

Liang, J. L. (2022). A Comparative Study of the Introductions of English and Chinese Passenger Vehicle Official Websites from the Perspective of Genre Analysis. Modern English, 16,110-114.

Liao, M., & Liao, Y. (2022). Improving Chinese College Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Presentation-Assimilation-Discussion-Exercise Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874531

Ma, H. (2022). Analysis of English Teaching Status and Reform Strategy in Higher Vocational Colleges. Overseas English, 10, 226-227+235.

Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and Language Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003

Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, C. (2020). Detected Difficulties in Argumentative Writing: The Case of Culturally and Linguistically Saudi Backgrounded Students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 15–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48710081

Pham, V. P. H., & Bui, T. K. L. (2021). Genre-based Approach to Writing in EFL Contexts. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n2p95

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Tian, Z. H. (2019). On the Problems of English Writing in Higher Vocational College and the Solutions. Journal of Lvliang University, 9(6),91-93.

Wang, B., & Ma, Y. (2022). Introducing M.A.K. Halliday (1st ed.). Routledge.

Wang, C. (2016). A Comparative Genre Analysis of Schematic Structures in Public Speeches of Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 4(5), 320-330. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2016.040502

Wu, J. (2022). Research on High Vocational College Students’ Problems and Countermeasures of English Writing Ability. Industrial & Science Tribune, 21(10). 196-197.

Yang, S. J., & Xiao, D. J. (2023). Genre Analysis of English Application Letter from the Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences), 1,105-110.

Zein, T. T., Sinar, T. S., & Yusuf, M. (2021). The Schematic Structure of North Sumatran Folktales. KnE Social Sciences, 5(4), 629-638. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8718

Zhang, Y. (2018). An Investigation into the Development of Structure and Evidence Use in Argumentative Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(11), 1441- 1448. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0811.08

Zhang, Y., Dai, L. F., & Li, J. N. (2019). Move Structure Analysis of English Linguistics Master’s Thesis Literature Review. Think Tank Era, 48, 187-188.

Zhao, Y. (2020). Analysis of Genre Characteristics of the English Homepage of Xiamen University Website. Modern Communication, 21, 101-103.

Zheng, C. (2013). A Structure Analysis of English Argumentative Writings Written by Chinese and Korean EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 6(9), http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n9p67