Pendekatan Proses Belajar dalam kalangan Murid Sejarah: Permukaan atau Dalaman?
Abstract
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti amalan pendekatan proses belajar yang lebih dominan yang dipraktikkan dalam kalangan murid sejarah. Seramai 150 orang murid terlibat dalam kajian ini. Instrumen kajian ini merupakan Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire. Data kajian ini telah dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensi. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa amalan pendekatan proses belajar permukaan dan dalaman berada pada tahap sederhana tinggi. Selain itu, amalan pendekatan proses belajar dalaman berada pada tahap sederhana tinggi manakala proses belajar permukaan berada pada tahap sederhana rendah bagi murid lelaki dan perempuan walaupun tidak terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan amalan pendekatan proses belajar berdasarkan jantina. Dapatan kajian ini turut melaporkan bahawa amalan pendekatan proses belajar dalaman merupakan pendekatan proses belajar yang lebih dominan dipraktikkan dalam kalangan murid sejarah. Implikasi kajian ini telah mencadangkan kepada guru-guru sejarah untuk melaksanakan proses pembelajaran yang berkesan menjurus ke arah pengaplikasian pendekatan pembelajaran secara mendalam yang berpusatkan murid.
Downloads
References
Abbey, S., Bailey, B., Dubrich, J., Moore, K., Young, J.N., Pedretti, E & Saranchuh, R. (1997). Multipradigm voices of doctoral sudents: shifting the boundaries of learning through a collaborative study process. Qualitative Studies in Educational, 10(1), 101-115.
Ahamed, S.S., Almarzaq, A., Almaghen, R., Alhardi, O., Jallal, A & Aloring, M. (2017). Assessing Saudi Medical students learning approach using the revisted two factors study process questionnaire. International Journal of Medical Education, 272 – 296.
Astika, G. & Samakal, D.T.Y.G. (2020). Students profiles through learning approaches using Biggs study process Questionnaire. ELTR Journal, 4(1), 36-42.
Baharom Mohamad & Iliyas Hashim (2010). Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Selangor: Pendidikan PTS professional.
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australia Council for Educational Research.
Bliac, A.M., Ellis, R.A., Goodyear, P., & Muntele, D. (2011). Understanding student learning in context: Relationship between students’ social identity, approaches to learning and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 427 – 433.
Bronde, M.L., Ceboilla-Cornejo, J., Peiri, R., Andress, C.N., Esteras, C., Ferriol, M., Merle, H., Diez, M.J & Perezende-Castren, A. (2020). Study approaches of life science students using the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Education Science, 10(173), 1-19.
Choy, J.L.F, O’Gready, G & Rotgans, J.I. (2012). Is the study process Questionnaire (SPQ) a good predictor of academic achievement? Examining the mediating role aof achievement related classroom behaviours. Instruction Sciences, 40, 159-172.
Cillers, C.D & Sternberg, R.J (2001). Thinking styles: Implications for optimizing learning and teaching in university education. South Afrika Journal Humanities of Education, 15(1), 13 – 24.
Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Schuster Macmillan.
Ellah, B. O., Nwargu, L.N., & Achor, E.E. (2018). Metacognition awareness and study process of senior secondary school sciences students of low ability level. Journal of research in curriculum teaching, 10(1), 103 – 180.
Entwistle, N. & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environment. Higher Education, 19, 169 – 194.
Entwistle, N.J. (1987). A model of the teaching – learning process. In J.T.E, Richardson, M.W. Bysenak and D. Warren Piper, (eds), Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keyness: SRHE and Open University Press, 13- 28.
Faridah Hussin, Salina Hamed & Sarina Md Jam. (2017). Approaches to learning of Engineering Students: Deep or surface? International Academic Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 122- 127.
Fatima, K. & Rizof, R.F. (2019). Comparing the learning approaches using Biggs Revides Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) among Dental Undergraduates. JPDA, 28(2), 68-73.
Fourie, C.M. (2003). Deep learning? What deep learning? South Africa Journal Humanities of Education, 17(1), 123- 131.
Gagnon, G.W., & Collay D.M. (2001). Design for learning: Six elements in constructivist classrooms. California: Corwin Press.
Garrison, D.R., Andrews, J & Magnusson, K. (1995). Approaches to teaching and learning in higher education. New Currents 2.1, January 1995.
Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327–341.
Hassall, T. & Joyce, J. (2001). Approaches to learning of management accounting students. Education & Training, 43(3), 145 – 152.
Kember, D. & Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal Education Psychology, 68, 395 – 407.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembanguan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lake, W., Boyd, W & Boyd, W. (2017). Understanding how students study: The Genealogy and Conceptual basis of a widely used pedagogical research tool, Biggs’ Study Process Questionnaire. International Education Studies, 10(5), 100 – 108.
Leung, M.Y., Li, J., Fang, X., & Lu, M. (2006). Learning approaches of construction engineering student: A comparative study between Hong Kong and Mainland China. Journal Education Environment, 1(1), 112 – 131.
Mok, S.S (2008). Pedagogi untuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn Bhd.
Noriati, A. Rashid., Boon, P.Y., & Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2009). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
Phan, H.P., & Deo, B. (2007).The revised learning process questionnaire: A validation of a western model of students’ study approaches to the South Pacific context using confirmatory factor analysis. British Jounal of Educational Psychology, 77, 719 – 739.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Tingkatan Empat dan Lima. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Sharifah Amnah Syed Ahmad. (2009). Sumbangan peramal kognitif dan bukan kognitif terhadap pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar di sebuah institusi Pengajian tinggi awam. Tesis Ijazah kedoktoran Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Smith, L. (2005). An investigation into student approaches to learning at a multicultural university using the revised study process Questionnaire. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds.), Higher Education in a Changing World: Higher Education Research and Development (pp. 533-541). Sydney: HERDSA.
Suppiah Nachiappan, Ramlah Jantan dan Abdul Aziz Abdul Shukor (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd
Taher, A.M.H & Jin, C. (2011). Assessing learning approaches of Chinese local MBA students: An investigation using the Revides Two-factor Study Process Qustionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Educational Research and Reviews, 6(19), 974-978.
Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265-275.
Wartinelli, V. & Reykau, M. (2017). Evaluation of the Revised Two factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2f) for the student teacher approaches to learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 9-13.
Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Metacognitive Awareness and Achievement Focused Motivation as the predictor of the study process. International Journal Social Science and Education, 3(4), 1013-1026.
Zhang, L.P. (2000). University students learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs 3P models. Journal Psychology, 134, 31 – 36.
