Penglibatan Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat dalam Pembelajaran Matematik Atas Talian terhadap Pencapaian Matematik
Abstract
Kajian ini bertujuan bertujuan mengkaji hubungan antara faktor penglibatan kognitif, penglibatan afektif dan penglibatan tingkah laku terhadap pencapaian pentaksiran pelajar pintar dan berbakat dalam pembelajaran Matematik atas talian. Seramai 119 orang pelajar di Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara UKM telah terlibat dalam kajian ini dan pemilihan responden adalah dilaksanakan secara rawak berdasarkan jumlah populasi pelajar pintar berbakat di kolej tersebut. Kajian ini menggunakan analisis korelasi dan regressi berganda bagi mengkaji hubungan faktor penglibatan kognitif, afektif dan tingkah laku dalam kalangan pelajar pintar dan berbakat (PPB) semasa sesi pembelajaran atas talian terhadap pencapaian subjek Matematik. Hasil kajian analisis korelasi mendapati faktor penglibatan kognitif, afektif dan tingkah laku mempengaruhi pencapaian Matematik. Hasil kajian analisis regresi berganda menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara penglibatan kognitif(β = 0.408, p < 0.001), penglibatan afektif (β = 0.670, p < 0.001), penglibatan tingkah laku(β = -7.012 , p < 0.01) dan pencapaian matematik. Kajian lanjutan pada masa yang akan datang, dicadangkan menambah pelbagai dimensi selain dari tiga dimensi yang dikaji iaitu penglibatan kognitif, penglibatan tingkah laku dan penglibatan afektif.
Downloads
References
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Barana, A., Fissore, C. & Marchisio, M. (2018). Online Tutoring to Enhance University Success. European Distance and E-Learning Network 2018 Annual Conference, pp. 755-763. European Distance and E-Learning Network.
Bonett, D. G. & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
Bowden, J.; Bowden Tickle, L.; Naumann, K. (2019). The Four Pillars of Tertiary Student Engagement and Success: A Holistic Measurement Approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079
Bulut, A. S., Yildiz, A., & Baltachi, S. (2020). A comparison of mathematics learning approaches of gifted and non-gifted students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 461-491. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.682111
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of educational research, 59(2), 117-142. https://ed.buffalo.edu/content/dam/ed/main/docs/newsletter/Fall09-Jeremy-Finn-Withdrawing.pdf
Fredericks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543074001059
Fung, J. J. Y., Yuen, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2014). Self-Regulation in Learning Mathematics Online: Implication for Supporting Mathematically Gifted Students with or without Learning Difficulties. Gifted and Talented International, 29(1-2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2014.11678434
Iji, C. O., Abah, J. A., & Anyor, J. W. (2018). Educational cloud services and the mathematics confidence, affective engagement, and behavioral engagement of mathematics education students in public universities in Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(1), 47-60.
Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
Kong, Q. P., Wong, N. Y. & Lam, C. C. (2003). Student Engagement in Mathematics: Development of Instrument and Validation of Construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217366
Martina Maamin, Siti Mistima Maat & Zanaton H. Iksan. (2021). Analysis of the factors that influence mathematics achievement in the ASEAN countries. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 371-388. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-9081
Muhammad, A., George T., o, U.A. & Asfa, M.D. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through heterogeneous pedagogical approaches: action research in a university level course in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0375
Odera, F. (2007). Learning Kiswahili language by radio at distance in secondary schools in Nyakach. Nyando district. Kenya. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 89-105.
OECD. (2002). Reading for change. Performance and engagement across countries. Results from PISA 2000. Paris.
Papadopoulos, D. (2021). Examining the Relationships among Cognitive Ability, Domain-Specific Self-Concept, and Behavioral Self-Esteem of Gifted Children Aged 5–6 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study. Behavioral Sciences, 1(7), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070093
Russo, T., & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with Invisible Others: Perceptions of Online Presence and their Relationship to Cognitive and Affective Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070093
Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3-4), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2005-338
Syarifuddin, H., & Atweh, B. (2022). The use of activity, classroom discussion, and exercise (ACE) teaching cycle for improving students’ engagement in learning elementary linear algebra. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 104-138. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11405
Veiga, F. H., García Pérez, J. F., Reeve, J., Wentzel, K., & Garcia, O. F. (2015). When adolescents with high self-concept lose their engagement in school. Revista de psicodidáctica, 20(2), 305-320. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/48331
Walker, K. A., & Koralesky, K. E. (2021). Student and instructor perceptions of engagement after the rapid online transition of teaching due to COVID‐19. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), e20038. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20038
Weiner, J. 2007. Measurement: Reliability and Validity Measures. New York: School of Public Health.
Wester, E. R., Walsh, L. L., Arango-Caro, S., & Callis-Duehl, K. L. (2021). Student Engagement Declines in STEM Undergraduates during COVID-19 –Driven Remote Learning. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 22(1), 221-2385. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2385
Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta‐analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1330-1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2303
Zanariah, A., & Zainun, A. (2020). Kebimbangan Sosial dalam Kalangan Pelajar Muslim Pintar dan Berbakat: Social Anxiety Among Gifted and Talented Muslim Students. ‘Abqari Journal, 23(2), 89-9. https://103.18.93.46/index.php/abqari/article/view/353
