Kemahiran Kesedaran Metakognitif Guru dan Guru Pelatih Matematik: Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik

  • Dyg Nur Fathiah Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Muhammad Sofwan Mahmud Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: metakognitif, kesedaran metakognitif, guru, guru pelatih, matematik

Abstract

Metakognisi merujuk kepada peraturan kendiri individu terhadap pembelajaran mereka sendiri, termasuk kesedaran tentang kekuatan dan kelemahan mereka sendiri, serta pengiktirafan strategi yang mungkin berguna untuk berkembang dalam tugas tertentu. Walau bagaimanapun, kajian sorotan literatur bersistematik berkenaan kesedaran metakognitif guru masih kurang dijalankan di Malaysia. Oleh itu, kajian literatur bersistematik ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara kritikal tentang trend penyelidikan berkenaan kesedaran metakognitif guru dan guru pelatih Matematik. Dua pangkalan data iaitu SCOPUS, Web Of Science (WOS) dan Google Scholar telah digunakan untuk mencari artikel yang berkaitan dalam tempoh 5 tahun terkini (2018-2022). Semakan sistematik ini telah dikendalikan selaras dengan Item Pelaporan Pilihan untuk Kenyataan Kajian Semula dan Meta-Analisis (PRISMA). Dapatan kajian pula mendapati bahawa trend penerbitan bagi kajian ini adalah meningkat sebanyak 16 kajian. Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat pihak yang mengambil berat tentang kesedaran metakognitif dalam kalangan guru dan guru pelatih. Oleh itu, hasil dapatan ini dapat memberi sumbangan pengkaji yang mengkaji kesedaran metakognitif guru pada masa akan datang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ader, E. (2019). What would you demand beyond mathematics? Teachers’ promotion of students’ self-regulated learning and metacognition. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01054-8

Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry learning model in improving prospective teachers’ metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12229a

Baltaci, S. (2018). The Impact of Teaching Geometric Locus Problems in a Computer-Assisted Environment on the Metacognitive Awareness of Preservice Teachers. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.2.10

Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1309–1332. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i25.1620

Daher, W., & Baya'a, N., & Anabousy, A., & Jaber, O., (2019). Development of Pre-service Teachers' Perceptions of Using Metacognitive Skills in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 14, 109-116.

Daher, W., & Hashash, I. (2022). Mathematics Teachers’ Encouragement of Their Students’ Metacognitive Processes. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(9), 1272-1284.

Desoete, A., & De Craene, B. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: An overview. ZDM, 51(4), 565-575.

Eriyani, E. (2020). Metacognition Awareness and Its Correlation with Academic Achievement of Educational Students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|, 4(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v4i1.8573

Flavell, J. H. (1971). Stage-related properties of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 421–453

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. B. Resnick (ed.), The nature of Intelligence (pp. 231--236). Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.

Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Shia, R., & Hong, N. S. (2000). Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Problem-Solving: Expanding the Theory Base through Factor Analysis

Hughes, A. J., & Partida, E. (2020). Promoting preservice STEM education teachers’ metacognitive awareness: Professional development designed to improve teacher metacognitive awareness. Journal of Technology Education, 32(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i1.a.1

Idrus, N. M., & Maat, S. M. (2021). Systematic literature review: components of self-efficacy in Mathematics education. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1).

Jiang, Y., Ma, L., & Gao, L. (2016). Assessing teachers' metacognition in teaching: The teacher metacognition inventory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 403-413.

Kartika, H., & Firmansyah, D. (2018). Peran kesadaran metakognitif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Jurnal Theorems, 3(2), 1-6.

Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview

Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition?. Phi delta kappan, 87(9), 696-699.

Misu, L., Budayasa, I. K., Lukito, A., & Rahim, U. (2019). Profile of Metacognition of Mathematics Education Students in Understanding the Concept of Integral in Category Classifying and Summarizing. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 481-496

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. S. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. In Educational Psychology:Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: A Special Issue of Educational Psychologist (1st ed., p. 13). Routledge.

Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools?. Educational Review, 71(4), 483-500.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.

Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). 2. Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning. Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, 3.

Shahbari, J. A., Daher, W., Baya’a, N., & Jaber, O. (2020). Prospective teachers’ development of meta-cognitive functions in solving mathematical-based programming problems with scratch. Symmetry, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12091569

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371.

Siddiqui, G. K., Taj, S., & Maqsood, F. (2020). Metacognitive awareness, procrastination and its impact on students’ academic performance. sjesr, 3(4), 400-406

Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 245-277

Tachie, S. A., & Molepo, J. M. (2019). Exploring Teachers’ Meta-Cognitive Skills in Mathematics Classes in Selected Rural Primary Schools in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Africa Education Review, 16(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1384700

Tan Abdullah, N., Shukri Nordin, Z., & Zulkiply, N. (2021). Cabaran Penerapan Strategi Metakognitif dalam Pengajaran Penyelesaian Masalah Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(3), 239-249.

Tay, L. Y., Tan, L. S., Tan, J. Y., Aiyoob, T. B., Ong, M. W. L., Lim-Ratnam, C., & Chua, P. H. (2021). Validity and reliability of an English translation of the Teacher Metacognition Inventory (TMI) with mathematics teachers in Singapore. Current Psychology, 1-14.

Temur, Ö. D., Özsoy, G., & Turgut, S. (2019). Metacognitive instructional behaviours of preschool teachers in mathematical activities. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01069-1

Raymond, K. M. (2018). First-year secondary mathematics teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of communication activities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(3), 167-179.

Ozturk, M. (2021). Cognitive and Metacognitive Skills Performed by Math Teachers in the Proving Process of Number Theory. Athens Journal of Education, 8(1), 53-71

Öztürk, M., & Kaplan, A. (2018). Cognitive analysis of constructing algebraic proof processes: A mixed method research. Egitim ve Bilim, 44(197), 25 -64.

Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2020). Formative Assessment as a Predictor of Mathematics Teachers’ Levels of Metacognitive Regulation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14158A

Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-48.

Yavuz, G. (2019). The Relationship of Learning Approaches, Opinions about Mathematical Proof and Metacognitive Awareness. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.04.006

Yorulmaz, A., Uysal, H., & Çokçaliskan, H. (2021). Pre-service primary school teachers’ metacognitive awareness and beliefs about mathematical problem solving. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.14349

Published
2022-11-30
How to Cite
Fathiah, D. N. and Mahmud, M. S. (2022) “Kemahiran Kesedaran Metakognitif Guru dan Guru Pelatih Matematik: Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11), p. e001856. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i11.1856.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)