Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Kualiti Hidup Perumahan Awam Bagi Miskin Bandar

Zulasri Pitting; Marsitah Mohd Radzi

doi:10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1596

Zulasri Pitting Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-6658
Marsitah Mohd Radzi Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-0599

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1596

Keywords: Kualiti Hidup, Instrumen, Perumahan Awam

Abstract

Keperluan untuk menjalankan kajian bagi membentuk instrumen kualiti hidup perumahan awam bagi miskin bandar semakin ketara apabila isu seperti ketidakpuashatian penghuni dan tekanan perumahan masih lagi berlaku. Sekiranya masalah dan isu ini tidak diatasi ianya akan memberikan impak yang negatif kepada kualiti hidup penghuni. Oleh yang tersebut, matlamat kajian ini adalah untuk mengesahkan instrumen kualiti hidup perumahan awam bagi miskin bandar. Analisis CFA yang dibuat ke atas model pengukuran hipotesis menunjukkan ianya mencapai nilai kesepadan model pengukuran yang telah ditetapkan setelah pengubahsuaian model dibuat. Analisis CFA juga turut mengesahkan bahawa terdapat tujuh konstruk yang menerangkan kualiti hidup perumahan awam bagi miskin bandar. Hasil analisis kesahan menunjukkan instrumen kajian mempunyai kesahan yang baik dimana kesemua konstruk mencapai nilai AVE>0.5 dan nilai punca kuasa dua AVE adalah lebih besar daripada nilai korelasi konstruk yang lain. Hasil analisis kebolehpercayaan pula mendapati bahawa kesemua konstruk kualiti hidup memperolehi nilai CR>0.7 menunjukkan bahawa instrumen mempunyai kebolehpercayaan yang baik. Oleh yang tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahawa instrumen kajian yang dibentuk adalah instrumen yang sah dan boleh dipercayai sebagai petunjuk kualiti hidup perumahan awam bagi miskin bandar. Hasil kajian ini dapat digunakan sebagai rujukan khususnya dalam pembangunan perumahan awam bagi golongan miskin bandar sama ada oleh pihak kerajaan mahupun pihak swasta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1).

Ab Rani, N. Z. A., Ghazali, R., Siwar, C., Isa, Z., & Ismail, M. K. (2019). The vulnerability factor analysis of B40 household income group in Southern Region of Kelantan using confirmatory factor analysis. Academic Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(2), pp 1-16.

Aminian, L. (2019). Housing satisfaction and quality of life (an empirical research among residents of a Dutch city). European Real Estate Society (ERES). https://doi.10.15396/eres2019_376.

Babyak, M. A., & Green, S. B. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(6), 587-597.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.

Besar, J.A., Ali, M., WC, V.Y., Lyndon, N. & Ali, M.N.S. (2018). Impak Sosioekonomi dan Politik Program Perumahan Rakyat Lembah Subang, Selangor (The Socio-economic and Polical Impact of Peoples’ Housing Programme in Lembah Subang, Selangor). Akademika, 88(1).

Fabrigar L. R., MacCallum R. C., Wegener D. T., Strahan E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.

Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370-378.

Gou, Z., Xie, X., Lu, Y., & Khoshbakht, M. (2018). Quality of Life (QoL) Survey in Hong Kong: Understanding the Importance of Housing Environment and Needs of Residents from Different Housing Sectors. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health, 15(2), 219.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010a). Multivariate Data Analysis, (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010b). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010c). Multivariate data analysis. Maxwell Macmillan International Editions.

Holmes-Smith, P., Coote, L., & Cunningham, E. (2006). Structural equation modeling: From the fundamentals to advanced topics. Melbourne: SREAMS.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6.

Kline R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

Kline R.B. (2010) Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press.

Krabbe, P. (2017). Validity The Measurement of Health and Health Status. Concepts, Methods and Applications from a Multidisciplinary Perspective, 113-134.

Levine, T. R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and scale validation in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 22, 335-338.

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59-82.

Muijs, D. (2011). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. Dalam Ghazali, N. H. M. 2016. A Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the School-Based Assessment System: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(2), 148-157.

Nelson, G., & Saegert, S. (2009). Housing and quality of life: An ecological perspective. Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures, 3363-3382.

Nunnally, J.C. & I.H. Bernstein, (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill

Pinto, S., Fumincelli, L., Mazzo, A., Caldeira, S., & Martins, J. C. (2017). Comfort, well-being and quality of life: Discussion of the differences and similarities among the concepts. Porto Biomedical Journal, 2(1), 6-12.

Wahi, N., Zin, R. M., Munikanan, V., Mohamad, I., & Junaini, S. (2018). Problems and Issues of High Rise Low Cost Housing in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 341(1).

Yusof, N. (2019). Faktor Penyumbang kepada Tekanan Perumahan di Kawasan Perumahan Kos Rendah dan Sederhana Rendah di Pulau Pinang. KEMANUSIAAN: The Asian Journal of Humanities, 26(1).

Zainudin, A. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modeling. Bandar Baru Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication

Zaiţ, A., & Bertea, P. S. P. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing Journal, 9(2), 217-224.

Zebardast, E. (2009). The housing domain of quality of life and life satisfaction in the spontaneous settlements on the Tehran metropolitan fringe. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 307-324.