Pendayagunaan Rubrik Pemarkahan Pentaksiran Berterusan Amali Bagi Program Diploma Perakaunan di Kolej Vokasional: Masihkah Relevan?

  • Mohd Asnawi Kamaludin Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: rubrik, pentaksiran berterusan, amali, pemarkahan, kolej vokasional

Abstract

Kertas konsep ini membincangkan penggunaan rubrik pemarkahan amali dalam Pentaksiran Berterusan (PB) amali program Diploma Perakaunan di Kolej Vokasional Malaysia. Penggunaan rubrik pemarkahan digunakan oleh pensyarah untuk mengukur tahap pencapaian dalam pentaksiran berterusan yang dilaksanakan oleh pelajar. Pertimbangan yang adil dan telus oleh pensyarah menjadi sandaran kepada penggunaan rubrik untuk menilai pelajar. Selain itu, rubrik permarkahan juga digunakan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sebagai panduan pentaksiran kendiri sebelum pentaksiran sebenar oleh pelajar. Kajian lepas banyak membincangkan penggunaan rubrik dalam konteks sebagai alat pengukuran dalam pentaksiran yang subjektif. Implikasi, cabaran dan strategi turut dibincangkan dan dikenal pasti untuk memastikan keberkesanan penggunaannya. Perbincangan kertas konsep ini dapat menggalakkan kajian lanjut bagi terhadap penghasilan rubrik yang lebih mendalam dan holistik dalam pentaksiran dan pembelajaran terutama dalam konteks kursus perakaunan di Kolej Vokasional.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, E. & Shukor, A. A. A. (2012). Pentaksiran Prestasi dan Pentaksiran Rujukan Standard dalam Bilik Darjah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Tanjong Malim.

Azmanirah Ab Rahman, Nurfirdawati Muhamad Hanafi Anizam Mohamed Yusof, Halizah Awang. (2019). Analisis Kefungsian Skala Bagi Pembinaan Rubrik Pentaksiran Kompetensi Amali: Analisis Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch Pelbagai Facet, Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 4(2), 120–126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.00.00.0000.00.0000

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Book 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Bahagian Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional. (2019). Peraturan Akademik Kolej Vokasional. Program Diploma Kolej Vokasional, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Bahagian Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional (2014). Garis Panduan Peraturan Pentaksiran dan Pentaksiran DVM. Kolej Vokasional, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Burke, K. (2001). From Standards to Rubric in Six Steps: Tools for Assessing Student Learning. Corwin A Sage Company.

Bourke, R. (2018). Self-assessment to incite learning in higher education: Developing ontological awareness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 827-.839 https://doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1411881.

Clausen-May, Tandi & Jones, Keith & McLean, Alan & Rowlands, Stuart & Carson, Robert. (2000). Perspectives on the design of the school geometry curriculum. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 20. 34-41.

Exposito-Langa, M., Nicolau-Julia, D., & Tomas-Miquel, J. V. (2017). The evaluation by competencies in degrees. Development of an experience in the business administration degree using and validating a rubric. Revista Complutense De Educacion, 28(4), 1155-1171. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.51618

Francis, J. E. (2018). Linking Rubrics and Academic Performance: An Engagement Theory Perspective. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14453/jutlp.v15i1.3

Fraile, Juan & Panadero, Ernesto & Pardo, Rodrigo. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 53, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003.

Hung, Y. J. (2019). Bridging assessment and achievement: Repeated practice of self-assessment in college English classes in Taiwan. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1584783.

Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2013). Buku Informasi PBS.

MacDougall, M.,Riley, S.C., Cameron, H.S., & McKinstry, B. (2008). Halos and Horns in the assessment of undergraduate medical students: A consistency-based approach. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods (JAQM), 3(2), 116-128.

Mohamed Najib Abdul Ghafar, Sanitah Mohd Yusof, Razak Idris, Noraini Mohd Noor, Halijah Ibrahim, & A. Hadi Bunyamin. (2012). Panduan Asas Pentaksiran Fakulti Pendidikan UTM. Johor Bahru

Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah., & Leow, T. W. (2016). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen pentaksirankendiri pembelajaran Geografi tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211-265.

Mohd Salleh Lebar. (2007). Pentadbiran pendidikan & pendidikan di Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Addison Wesley Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Noor, N., Janan, D., & Arshad, M. (2020). Validasi terhadap rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah melalui penskoran kendiri pelajar terhadap tugasan. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 17(1), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.8

Novak, J.D., Mintzes, J.J., & Wandersee, J.H. (2005). Asessing science understanding. San Diego, CA: Elsever Inc.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002

Popham, W. J. 1997. What’s Wrong and What’s right with Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 72–75.

Reddy, Y. M. & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859

Rubin, S. (1982). Performance appraisal: A guide to better supervisor evaluation processes. In Panel resource Paper No. 7, in National Society for Internships and Experiental Eduction. Washington, DC.

Saribeyli, F. R. (2018). Theoretical and practical aspects of student self-assessment. Obrazovanie I Nauka-Education and Science, 20(6), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-183-194.

Sundeen, T. H. (2014). Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality. Assessing Writing, 21, 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003

Wang, W. Q. (2017). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: Student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1280-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993

Wong, H. M. (2017). Implementing self-assessment in Singapore primary schools: Effects on students’ perceptions of self-assessment. Pedagogies, 12(4), 391-409. https://doi.orf/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1362348.

Zamora, A., Suarez, J. M., & Ardura, D. (2018). Error detection and self-assessment as mechanisms to promote self-regulation of learning among secondary education students. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1225657.

Zimmaro, D.M. (2004). Developing grading rubrics. http://bsuenglish101.pbworks.com/f/rubricshandout.pdf

Published
2022-04-10
How to Cite
Kamaludin, M. A. and Mohd Matore, M. E. @ E. (2022) “Pendayagunaan Rubrik Pemarkahan Pentaksiran Berterusan Amali Bagi Program Diploma Perakaunan di Kolej Vokasional: Masihkah Relevan?”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(4), p. e001458. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i4.1458.
Section
Articles