Hubungan Sikap dengan Amalan Guru Terhadap Penggunaan Kaedah Analisis Kesilapan dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik
Abstract
Matematik adalah subjek yang boleh dijadikan platform bagi melatih pelajar berfikir secara kreatif dan kritis. Oleh itu, kaedah analisis kesilapan dilihat sebagai kaedah yang boleh digunakan guru matematik dalam meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir pelajar. Walau bagaimanapun, guru perlu memastikan keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah analisis kesilapan ini. Justeru, kajian ini dijalankan bagi mengenal pasti tahap sikap ke atas kesilapan diri sendiri dan tahap amalan guru terhadap penggunaan kaedah analisis kesilapan. Hubungan antara sikap dengan amalan guru matematik terhadap penggunaan kaedah analisis kesilapan dalam pengajaran matematik juga turut dikenal pasti. Instrumen kajian yang digunakan dalam kajian tinjauan ini adalah borang soal selidik Orientasi Analisis Kesilapan (OAK). Sejumlah 65 orang responden yang terdiri dari guru matematik dari tiga buah Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan (SMK) di daerah Bangsar Pudu telah terlibat. Data telah dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif dan inferensi menggunakan perisian Statitical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) versi 26. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap sikap guru terhadap kesilapan diri sendiri dan tahap amalan guru menggunakan kaedah analisis kesilapan dalam PdP matematik adalah tinggi. Analisis Korelasi Spearman Rho pula menunjukkan tahap sikap terhadap kesilapan diri sendiri mempengaruhi tahap amalan guru dalam menggunakan kaedah analisis kesilapan. Kesimpulannya, sikap guru adalah penting bagi memastikan kaedah analisis kesilapan ini diamalkan secara efektif. Kajian lanjutan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang boleh mempengaruhi tahap amalan guru dalam menggunakan kaedah analisis kesilapan di dalam PdP matematik adalah dicadangkan.
Downloads
References
Agustyaningrum, N., Abadi, A. M., Sari, R. N., & Mahmudi, A. (2018). An Analysis of Students’ Error in Solving Abstract Algebra Tasks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012118
Altun, S. D. G., & Konyalioglu, A. C. (2019). The influence of mistake-handling activities on mathematics education: An example of definitions. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.467
Best, J. W., & James V. Kahn. (2006). Research in Education, 10th Edition. Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. NJ: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.
Dewi, A. K., Sunardi, Irvan, M., Hobri, & Rohmah, F. N. (2020). Students’ error analysis in solving geometry problems based on the mathematical anxiety under the theory of van hiele. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012059
Fatmiyati, N., Triyanto, & Fitriana, L. (2020). Error analysis of undergraduate students in solving problems on ring theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012050
Humaira Salsabila, N., Lu’Luilmaknun, U., Wahyu Triutami, T., Hamdani, D., & Ayu Apsari, R. (2021). Proportion problems: Analyzing common errors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1778(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012034
Laelasari, Darhim, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Representation skills students reviewed from the prior knowledge through realistic mathematics education in a linear material program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012012
Mariana, A. (2019). From Mistakes, We Learn: Variations in Teacher Dis/Position Toward Errors in Mathematics Classrooms (Doctoral dissertaion). Available from ProQuest Dissertations database. (UMI No. 27665012).
Minarti, E. D., Wahyudin, & Alghadari, F. (2018). Student’s conceptions and geometry problem-solving of the distance in cube. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012033
Mulyatna, F., & Nofiansyah, W. (2019). Error patterns in determining combined probability functions from continuous random variables. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012111
Nik Pa, N. A. (2016). Penghasilan Disertasi Berkualiti dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Universiti Malaya.
Norkumalasari, O., Nor Hasnida, C. M. G., Mohd Nazir, M. Z., & Nazaruddin, A. H. (2020). Penerokaan dan Pengesahan Instrumen Sikap Terhadap Matematik Dalam Kalangan Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 8(4), 1–11.
Nur Hawa Hanis Abdullah, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Kesediaan guru melaksanakan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam pengajaran. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(3), 22–31.
Özreçberoğlu, N., & Çağanağa, Ç. K. (2018). Making it count: Strategies for improving problem-solving skills in mathematics for students and teachers’ classroom management. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82536
Priliawati, E., Slamet, I., & Sujadi, I. (2019). Analysis of junior high school students’ errors in solving HOTS geometry problems based on Newman’s error analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032131
Priyani, H. A., & Ekawati, R. (2018). Error analysis of mathematical problems on TIMSS: A case of Indonesian secondary students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012010
Rafi, I., & Retnawati, H. (2018). What are the common errors made by students in solving logarithm problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012157
Ratnaningsih, N., & Hidayat, E. (2021). Error analysis and its causal factors in solving mathematical literacy problems in terms of habits of mind. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012104
Santoso, D. A., Farid, A., & Ulum, B. (2017). Error Analysis of Students Working about Word Problem of Linear Program with NEA Procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 855(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012043
Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Septianingsih, R., & Irwan, I. (2020). An Analysis of student’s improvement learning outcome and student’s errors based on new man using M-APOS learning approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012057
Siregar, B. H., Dewi, I., & Andriani, A. (2018). Error analysis of mathematics students who are taught by using the book of mathematics learning strategy in solving pedagogical problems based on Polya’s four-step approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 970(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/970/1/012004
Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2004). Principals’ sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230410554070
Turkdogan, A. (2020). Development of an Attitude Scale of Mathematics and Science Teachers towards Mistake and Instant Feedback to the Mistake: A Validity and Reliability Study. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(4), 642–650. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.64.642.650
Zulkifly, M. A., Rahimah, E., & Huda Afiqah, H. (2021). Perancangan Pengajaran Guru dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan: Satu Kajian Rintis. Asian Journal of Civilizational Studies(AJOCS), 3(1), 12–16.