Kemahiran Menjana Masalah Matematik Berayat Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Semakan dalam kalangan Guru Matematik
Abstract
Kemahiran menjana masalah merupakan salah satu model pembelajaran yang dapat merangsang proses meta kognitif pelajar dalam pembelajaran matematik. Namun begitu, penyelidikan tentang kemahiran menjana masalah matematik berayat dan cabaran yang dihadapi oleh guru matematik sekolah rendah di Malaysia adalah terhad. Dengan itu, tujuan kajian ini adalah mengenal pasti kemahiran dan cabaran guru matematik sekolah rendah dalam menjana masalah matematik berbentuk ayat berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Sehubungan itu, sebuah kajian kes pelbagai lapangan dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan gabungan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Seramai 5 orang responden dipilih melalui kaedah pensampelan bertujuan. Instrumen kajian ini adalah satu set soalan terbuka, soal selidik dan soalan temu bual semi struktur. Seterusnya, dapatan kajian dianalisis secara deskriptif dan tematik. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa guru matematik lebih berkemahiran menjana masalah aras pemikiran aras rendah berbanding masalah aras pemikiran tinggi berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom semakan tahun 2001. Selain itu, kajian juga mendapati bahawa guru matematik sekolah rendah menghadapi pelbagai cabaran dalam proses menjana masalah matematik berayat. Antaranya adalah ketidakpastian terhadap proses menjana masalah, kekeliruan terhadap aras kesukaran masalah matematik yang dijana, faktor literasi bahasa dan literasi matematik murid yang lemah, kekurangan amalan menjana masalah matematik berayat, kekurangan keyakinan diri dan pendedahan terhadap penjanaan masalah matematik berayat yang terhad. Diharapkan kajian ini dapat menjadi bahan rujukan dan nilai tambah terhadap pembangunan profesionalisme guru matematik dalam aspek pedagogi.
Downloads
References
Abrar, A. I. P. (2018). Problem possing dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 2(2), 85–94.
Agnia, L. J., & Rosli, R. (2021). Penjanaan masalah matematik dalam kalangan pelajar : Kajian literatur bersistematik, 6(7), 208–227.
Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2009). Prospective teachers’ views about problem-posing activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.215
Anderson, L., Krathwol, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revison of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Arikan, E. E., & Unal, H. (2015). An investigation of eighth grade students’ problem posing skills (Turkey sample). International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.28526
Bialik, M. & Fadel, C. (2015). Skills for the 21st century: What should students learn? Montes Alti: Education Foundation.
Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2019). Is problem posing about posing “problems”? A terminological framework for researching problem posing and problem solving. Implementation Research on Problem Solving in School Settings, August, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959871167.0.02
Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project (4th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015007007
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2020). Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(September 2018), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001
Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem posing research in mathematics: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F.M. Singer, N.Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds), Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice., 569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3
Cail, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00142-6
Crespo, S. (2000). Optimal portfolio choice under a liability constraint. Annals of Operations Research, 97(1–4), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Third). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719832223
Ellerton. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problems : A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261–271.
English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. 183–217.
Ghasempour, Z., Bakar, M. N., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (2013). Innovation in teaching and learning through problem posing tasks and metacognitive strategies. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 1(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijpi/010108
Grundmeier, T. A. (2003). The effects of providing mathematical problem -posing experiences for K--8 pre-service teachers: Investigating teachers’ beliefs and characteristics of posed problems. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation
Harpster, D. L. (1999). A study of possible factors that influence the construction of teacher-made problems that assess higher-order thinking skills [Doctoral thesis, Montana State University]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20857278
Hendriana, H., Eti Rohaeti, E., & Hidayat, W. (2017). Metaphorical thinking learning and junior high school teachers’ mathematical questioning ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3614.55-64
Himmah, W. I., Nayazik, A., & Setyawan, F. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze the final mathematics examination problems in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012028
Işık, C., Öcal, T., & Kar, T. (2013). Analysis of pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of problem posing. In meeting of Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8), Antalya, Turkey.
Khoshaim, H. B., & Rashid, S. (2016). Assessment of the assessment tool: Analysis of items in a Non-MCQ mathematics exam. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9110a
Kiliç, Ç. (2013). Pre-service primary teachers’ free problem-posing performances in the context of fractions: An example from Turkey. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0073-1
Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2698
Leung, S. S. (1994). Research on problem posing and its role in the curriculum. In Elementary mathematics curriculum overview for Grade 1-2. National Academy of Educational Research, 152-169.
Leung, S. S. (2013). Teachers implementing mathematical problem posing in the classroom: Challenges and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9436-4
Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the Arithmetic Problem Posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217299
Lowrie, T. (2002). Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217355
Mallart, A., Font, V., & Diez, J. (2018). Case study on mathematics pre-service teachers’ difficulties in problem posing. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 14(4), 1465-1481. doi:10.29333/ejmste/83682 Marzano,
Marham, M. A., Lee Abdullah, M. F. N., & Lee, T. T. (2021). Analisis kelebihan, cabaran pelaksanaan dan kepelbagaian strategi penjanaan masalah matematik. Global Journal of Educational Research & Management, 1, 16–28.
Mohd Rusdin, N., & Ali, S. R. (2013). Amalan dan cabaran pelaksanaan pembelajaran abad ke-21. Proceedings of Islamic Civilization and Technology Management, 2013–2025. https://www.tatiuc.edu.my/assets/files/ICTM19-Papers/ICTM-09.pdf
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics (NCSM). (1978). Position paper on basic mathematical skills. Mathematics Teacher, 71(2), 147-152.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nur Adilla Syafiqah Mohd Shafii, Roslinda Rosli, & Siti Farah Idayu Madi. (2021). Tahap keupayaan murid tahun enam dalam menjana masalah matematik semi-berstruktur. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(1), 645–654.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patáková, E. (2013). Teachers’ problem posing in mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 836–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.289
Peng, A., Ezeife, A., & Yu, B. (2018). Reciprocal learning in mathematics education: An interactive study between two Canadian and Chinese elementary schools. Comparative and International Education, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v47i1.9323
Plants, H., Dean, R., Sears, J., & Venable, W. (1980). A taxonomy of problem-solving activities and its implications for teaching. The Elementary Problem Solving in Engineering and Related Fields, ASEE, 3(1), 9–8. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:A+Taxonomy+of+Problem-Solving+Activities+and+Its+Implications+for+Teaching#0
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematics discovery: An understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (combined edition). New York: John Willey & Son.
Retno, N., Arfatin, N., & Nur, A. (2019). The effect of revised Bloom’S Taxonomy on mathematical problem-solving skill. Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 287(Icesre 2018), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.2991/icesre-18.2019.31
Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2014). The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis. International Education Studies, 7(13), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p227
Samo, D. D. (2017). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ conception of higher-order thinking level in Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p121-136
Salleh, F., Zakaria, E., & Maat, S. M. (2013). Meneroka keupayaan guru matematik dalam penjanaan masalah statistik. Himpunan Penyelidikan Pendidikan Serantau, January 2013, 317–328.
Shorser, L. (1999). Bloom’s Taxonomy interpreted for mathematics. www.coun.uvic.ca/learning/exams/blooms-taxonomy.hrml
Singer, F.M., Ellerton, N. & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
Stoyanova, E. (2000). Empowering students' problem solving via problem posing: The art of framing good questions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 56(1), 33-37.
Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students' problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 518–525.
Surya, Edy, & Sari, N. (2017). Analysis Effectiveness of using Problem Posing Model in Mathematical Learning: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(3), 13–21.
Ulfah, U., Prabawanto, S., & Jupri, A. (2017). Students’ mathematical creative thinking through problem posing learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012097
Widodo, A. (2006). Profil pertanyaan guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 139–148.
Yeo, J. B. W. (2007). Mathematical tasks : Clarification , classification and choice of suitable tasks for different types of learning and assessment. In Mathematics and Mathematics Education (Issue July).
Zuya., H. E. (2017). The benefits of problem posing in the learning of mathematics: A systematic review. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(3), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/3581
